TGI Friday Held Responsible for Stabbing Death


In January of 2009, Orlando Jordan was stabbed to death by Michael Castillo and Louis Martinez in a TGI Friday's restaurant. An argument broke out because Castillo disapproved of Jordan dating his mother.

There was a security video showing Castillo and Martinez fleeing the restaurant after the incident. Castillo and Martinez plead guilty to assault with a deadly weapon. Castillo was sentenced to three years in state prison, and Martinez was sentenced to four years.

Castillo was 20 years old at the time, and Jordan's parents argued that the restaurant continued to serve him alcohol without checking his identification first, and continued to serve him alcohol even though he was clearly intoxicated. The restaurant had served Castillo approximately 12 drinks within 30 minutes. The lawsuit brought by Jordan's parents also noted that the restaurant had a pattern of assaults and a lack of security cameras.

A South Carolina jury awarded $40 million in damages for the death of 33 year old Orlando Jordan.  The panel found the restaurant 55% responsible for the incident while Castillo and Martinez are responsible for 45%.

TGI Friday's has not said whether they are going to appeal the verdict or not.

The Jordan family attorney has made a statement saying, "This case is about holding corporations responsible for their reckless decisions to value profits over community safety."

Comments from Allen:
This type of lawsuit is based upon what is known as "dramshop" liability: holding a bar responsible for continuing to sell alcohol to a clearly intoxicated customer, who thereafter does something harmful in his drunken state. Kudos to the attorney for the victim's family here.

Wrongful death verdicts are based upon loss of relationship with family members as well as loss of lifetime earnings, and sometimes punitive damages as well.  In states with "tort reform," such as Idaho, such large verdicts are almost impossible to sustain.  The loss of relationship claim in Idaho is a "non-economic" loss, and, as a matter of law, such losses in verdicts may not exceed, as of this time, approximately $325,000 per person who suffers the loss.  Lifetime earnings generally are in the $1-$2 million range, and absent punitive damages, which by Idaho law must bear some relationship to the compensatory damages, a similar Idaho death case would be limited to an amount far below what was obtained in South Carolina.

The verdict splitting responsibility means that 55% of the verdict is payable by TGI Fridays, while 45% of the verdict is payable by Castillo and Martinez.  Since Castillo and Martinez are "turnips" (defendants you cannot even squeeze blood out of, much less any money to pay a judgment), and since TGI Friday's is very solvent and insured, the family will be able to actually collect $22 million of the judgment.

I would be surprised if TGI Friday's does not appeal this judgment.  They have nothing to lose, and millions to potentially gain by doing so.

***********************************************************************************************************************

Allen Browning is an attorney in Idaho Falls, Idaho who handles personal injury and criminal defense. He has over 30 years of experience and handled thousands of cases. Allen work with cases from all over Idaho. Call (208) 542-2700 to set up a free consultation if you are facing legal trouble or you have been involved in an accident.

Also, check out browninglaw.net for more information about Allen and Browning Law.

Allen Browning can help with all personal injury claims including motor vehicle accidents, serious and disabling accidents, and wrongful death claims. Allen Browning is an attorney who can also help with drunk driving (DUI) , Felony, Misdemeanor, Domestic Violence, Drug Crimes, Theft, Juvenile Crimes, Violent Crimes, and Probation/Parole Violations. He is one of the most experienced and successful criminal defense attorneys in Idaho.


Attorney Allen Browning can help with all personal injury claims including motor vehicle accidents, serious and disabling accidents, and wrongful death claims.


Sources for more information:
http://www.eater.com/2015/6/23/8830909/tgi-fridays-stabbing-death-lawsuit-40-million

 http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2015/06/22/family-awarded-40m-in-tgi-fridays-legal-battle-remembers-slain-son/

 http://www.mantecabulletin.com/section/140/article/125236/

 http://www.thenationaltriallawyers.org/2015/06/tgi-fridays-stabbing-death/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

7 Things Lawyers Can't Tell Jurors

Image
 It is a trial lawyer's job to educate jurors, and tell them what they need to know in order to decide cases. Despite this, there are many things, true things, that lawyers are not allowed to tell jurors directly in statements to the jury or indirectly through testimony of their witnesses. Lawyers know these things, though, and I thought you might like to know some of things. #1. A lawyer can't tell the jurors anything that happened during settlement negotiations. He cannot let the jurors know, when asking them to make the defendant pay his client $100,000 that the defendant agreed to pay him $80,000 prior to the trial. The reason for this is that you want settlement negotiations to be very open. You don't want to damage a negotiation session because someone is afraid that what they say will get repeated to a jury if you don't strike a deal. #2 In Idaho, a lawyer can't tell the jurors that the defendant has insurance. In many other states, he can. Bec
Read more

Man Framed by Prosecutor Released After 29 Years in Prison Seeking Lawsuit

Image
19 year old, Charise Kamps, was found raped and strangled to death in her apartment in June 1980. Ralph Armstrong told the police that both of them were at the apartment alone doing cocaine before leaving to go see friends around 9:30 pm. Police said that they learned that Armstrong owed Kamp's boyfriend $400 and witnesses saw Armstrong handing Kamps money that night. However, the money was not found in the apartment, and Armstrong deposited $315 in his bank the next day.The defense argued that he got the money from his brother. One of the neighbors saw a lean, muscular man about 5 feet 5 inches tall with long, dark hair drive up to the apartment. Before the identification process, the police had the witness hypnotized. He was shown a photograph of Armstrong, and After being hypnotized, the witness changed the height of the man he saw. Later at a lineup to have the witness select the man he saw, he chose Armstrong. The other people in the lineup were police officers in wigs
Read more

Tuesday Tip: Reid Interrogation Technique

Image
Various methods have been used in police interrogations to elicit a confession. By far the most popular method used for over seventy years is the Reid Technique. This interrogation method assumes guilty suspects can be identified from certain behavioral cues. It is said to be proven as highly effective at getting confessions; however, there has been criticism about it for many years because it has been linked to many wrongful convictions.  Around 25 percent of post conviction DNA exonerations have been associated with a false confession from authorities using the Reid Technique. Even one of the first cases in which John Reid used this technique turned out to be a false confession. More and more scientists and scholars are saying this approach is based on outdated psychology. There are several components incorporated in this technique, including room design and how the investigator conducts the interview. There are three spatial zones the investigators use, which can be seen in
Read more