SWAT Team Raids Wrong Address

Residents of the invaded home
Photo Source: Telegram
Marianne Diaz and her fiancé, Bryant Alequin, were startled when ten to fifteen SWAT team members burst through the front and back doors of their apartment with their guns drawn. The authorities entered the apartment at 5:30 AM. Diaz grabbed her two daughters(one of them disabled) and feared for her life. She was naked at the time and a female officer frisked her before they allowed her to put on clothes. 

Diaz said that the whole incident was traumatizing and that they were loud and vulgar.  Alequin was in the bathroom, and they put him in handcuffs that were very tight. He also suffered a minor back injury. Their roommate, Joshua Matos, had his wrist refractured during the raid. 

The State Police Troopers had a search warrant, but Diaz and her family were not who the authorities were looking for. The officers didn't seize anything during the raid, arrest anyone, or find the man the warrant authorize them to find. They had raided the apartment before because the previous resident had a criminal record and they found drugs during that raid. Diaz and her family moved to the apartment in May and they have had no issues with the legal system. The District Attorney’s office released a statement saying the warrant was based on the best knowledge at the time. 

Records show that the previous tenant they were looking for was arrested two weeks prior at a different address. 

The family has not decided if they are going to file a lawsuit. 


Comments from Allen:  As I stated in a prior blog, this scenario happens often, but the details of each incident vary somewhat from case to case.  We all agree the cops should not be bursting into the homes of innocent people, warrant or no warrant.  What went wrong here, and whose fault is it?

The issuance of a warrant, and the search of an apartment pursuant to that warrant, usually insulate police officers from liability.  However, the information used to obtain the warrant must be truthful and based upon information reasonably available to the state, or the state (the government authority involved) may suffer liability.

I believe the state made a gross error in obtaining the warrant to search the Marianne Diaz family and residence, and on that basis I believe the state has liability here.  The state cannot say it acted upon the best information available, when it had information available that the target suspect was either in jail, or out of jail and living at a different address.  


***********************************************************************************************************************

Allen Browning is an attorney in Idaho Falls, Idaho who handles personal injury and criminal defense. He has over 30 years of experience and handled thousands of cases. Allen handles cases from all over Idaho. Call (208) 542-2700 to set up a free consultation if you are facing legal trouble or you have been involved in an accident.

Also, check out browninglaw.net for more information about Allen and Browning Law.

Allen Browning can help with all personal injury claims including motor vehicle accidents,truck accidents, auto accidents, serious and disabling accidents, and wrongful death claims.

Allen Browning is an Idaho Falls attorney who can also help with drunk driving (DUI), traffic violations, Felony, Misdemeanor, Domestic Violence, Drug Crimes, Theft, Juvenile Crimes, battery and assault charges, Violent Crimes, and Probation/Parole Violations. He is one of the most experienced and successful criminal defense attorneys in Idaho.


Allen is able to provide his services if the incident occurs in the following Idaho Areas: American Falls, Arco, Blackfoot, Boise, Burley, Driggs, Idaho Falls, Malad City, Pocatello, Rexburg, Rigby, Salmon, St. Anthony, Twin Falls, Bannock County, Bingham County, Bonneville County, Butte County, Cassia County, Clark County, Fremont County, Jefferson County, Lemhi County, Madison County, Oneida County, Power County, Teton County, and Twin Falls County.    

Sources for more information:




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

7 Things Lawyers Can't Tell Jurors

Image
 It is a trial lawyer's job to educate jurors, and tell them what they need to know in order to decide cases. Despite this, there are many things, true things, that lawyers are not allowed to tell jurors directly in statements to the jury or indirectly through testimony of their witnesses. Lawyers know these things, though, and I thought you might like to know some of things. #1. A lawyer can't tell the jurors anything that happened during settlement negotiations. He cannot let the jurors know, when asking them to make the defendant pay his client $100,000 that the defendant agreed to pay him $80,000 prior to the trial. The reason for this is that you want settlement negotiations to be very open. You don't want to damage a negotiation session because someone is afraid that what they say will get repeated to a jury if you don't strike a deal. #2 In Idaho, a lawyer can't tell the jurors that the defendant has insurance. In many other states, he can. Bec
Read more

Man Framed by Prosecutor Released After 29 Years in Prison Seeking Lawsuit

Image
19 year old, Charise Kamps, was found raped and strangled to death in her apartment in June 1980. Ralph Armstrong told the police that both of them were at the apartment alone doing cocaine before leaving to go see friends around 9:30 pm. Police said that they learned that Armstrong owed Kamp's boyfriend $400 and witnesses saw Armstrong handing Kamps money that night. However, the money was not found in the apartment, and Armstrong deposited $315 in his bank the next day.The defense argued that he got the money from his brother. One of the neighbors saw a lean, muscular man about 5 feet 5 inches tall with long, dark hair drive up to the apartment. Before the identification process, the police had the witness hypnotized. He was shown a photograph of Armstrong, and After being hypnotized, the witness changed the height of the man he saw. Later at a lineup to have the witness select the man he saw, he chose Armstrong. The other people in the lineup were police officers in wigs
Read more

Tuesday Tip: Reid Interrogation Technique

Image
Various methods have been used in police interrogations to elicit a confession. By far the most popular method used for over seventy years is the Reid Technique. This interrogation method assumes guilty suspects can be identified from certain behavioral cues. It is said to be proven as highly effective at getting confessions; however, there has been criticism about it for many years because it has been linked to many wrongful convictions.  Around 25 percent of post conviction DNA exonerations have been associated with a false confession from authorities using the Reid Technique. Even one of the first cases in which John Reid used this technique turned out to be a false confession. More and more scientists and scholars are saying this approach is based on outdated psychology. There are several components incorporated in this technique, including room design and how the investigator conducts the interview. There are three spatial zones the investigators use, which can be seen in
Read more