Grumpy Cat Awarded $700,000 in a Lawsuit

The internet famous, Grumpy Cat, is a minor celebrity who became popular due to memes about her particularly angry face in 2012. She became a cash cow to her owner, Tabatha Bundesen, in Arizona. The cat's fame allowed Bundesen to quit her waitressing job at Red Lobster. 

Bundesen has created a company that processes branded clothing, pillows, mugs, pens, bags, and books "written" by the annoyed looking cat. Grumpy Cat even "wrote" a New York Times bestseller. Grumpy Cat, whose real name is Tardar Sauce, has appeared on "Today," "Good Morning America" and "American Idol." She also starred in a commercial for Honey Nut Cheerios and became spokescat for Friskies cat food in 2013.  The company has generated somewhere between $1-100 million within the first couple years. 
The cat found itself in an intellectual property dispute between the Grumpy Cat Limited company and the Grenade beverage company. An eight person jury in Santa Ana, California awarded Grumpy Cat Limited $710,001 in damages.

In 2013, Nick and Paul Sandford, the owners of Grenade made a licensing deal with Grumpy Cat Limited to sell a line of iced coffees called "Grumpy Cat Grumppuccino." But in 2015, the beverage company decided to create a line of "Grumpy Cat Roasted Coffee," which was not in the original deal. So Grumpy Cat Limited filed a copyright lawsuit in federal court. Grumpy Cat Limited also claimed that Grenade was selling unauthorized Grumppuccino T-shirts which "blatantly infringe on the Grumpy Cat copyrights and Grumpy Cat trademarks" without sharing the profits and that the beverage company wasn't paying the agreed-upon percentage of profits from the iced coffee.

Grenade then fired back with a countersuit in which it claimed that Grumpy Cat didn't hold up its end the agreement to promote the iced coffee. The countersuit also stated that Grumpy Cat Limited claimed the unhappy cat would star in a blockbuster movie alongside comedy superstars Will Ferrell and Jack Black. But the only movie Grumpy Cat has ever starred in was "Grumpy Cat's Worst Christmas," which was made for the Lifetime Network and earned a bleak 5.1 out of 10 stars on IMDb. During the week-long trial at which Grumpy Cat herself made an appearance, Grenade's attorney Brian Kinder said that Grumpy Cat didn't support the joint venture. He pointed to the fact that Grumpy Cat only posted about the iced coffee 17 times on social media. He also cited a Grumpy Cat appearance on the Fox News Show "Fox and Friends," Courthouse News reported. According to Kinder, the cat's handlers were supposed to say, "Watch out, Starbucks. The cat's coming for it," but didn't.

The jury wasn't persuaded.

"Grumpy Cat feels vindicated and feels the jury reached a just verdict," said David Jonelis, the attorney for Grumpy Cat Limited, according to Courthouse News.


Comments from Allen: Hell hath no furry like a cat wronged.

This tail can be divided into two parts: copyright/trademark law and contract law.

The cat owner holds the rights to the cat’s image and distinctive name.  By contract, she can license those rights to others.  Kudos to her for finding a way to make her cat pay for its own room and board .
The contract spells out exactly how much of those rights to image and name the licensee may use.  In this case, the jury was persuaded the license was very specific and limited.

Contracts like these usually do not spell out the penalty for violating the contract by using the name and image in an unauthorized way.  Copyright/trademark law comes in here.

The basic remedy for violating a copyright (reproducing picture of the cat for profit) or trademark (using the distinctive name or logo of a company to give consumers the impression your product is associated with that company)is to make the violator surrender the profits made as a result of the violation, and to make the violator pay the costs and attorney fees of the owner.  In this case, the profits were $700,001 dollars.

The news media almost never tells us how much was awarded in attorney fees or court costs.  There is a separate hearing about one or two months after the verdict is entered in which these amounts are argued before the court.  A case like this would commonly involve attorney fees approaching $200,000.

So if you believe the legal system only exists to protect fat cats, you may have a point.

***********************************************************************************************************************

Allen Browning is an attorney in Idaho Falls, Idaho who handles personal injury and criminal defense. He has over 30 years of experience and handled thousands of cases. Allen handles cases from all over Idaho. Call (208) 542-2700 to set up a free consultation if you are facing legal trouble or you have been involved in an accident.

Also, check out browninglaw.net for more information about Allen and Browning Law.

Allen Browning can help with all personal injury claims including motor vehicle accidents, truck accidents, auto accidents, serious and disabling accidents, and wrongful death claims.

Allen Browning is an Idaho Falls attorney who can also help with drunk driving (DUI), traffic violations, Felony, Misdemeanor, Domestic Violence, Drug Crimes, Theft, Juvenile Crimes, battery and assault charges, Violent Crimes, and Probation/Parole Violations. He is one of the most experienced and successful criminal defense attorneys in Idaho.


Allen is able to provide his services if the incident occurs in the following Idaho Areas: American Falls, Arco, Blackfoot, Boise, Burley, Driggs, Idaho Falls, Malad City, Pocatello, Rexburg, Rigby, Salmon, St. Anthony, Twin Falls, Bannock County, Bingham County, Bonneville County, Butte County, Cassia County, Clark County, Fremont County, Jefferson County, Lemhi County, Madison County, Oneida County, Power County, Teton County, and Twin Falls County.    
Sources for more information:
http://www.oregonlive.com/today/index.ssf/2018/01/grumpy_cat_owner_awarded_over.html

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

7 Things Lawyers Can't Tell Jurors

Image
 It is a trial lawyer's job to educate jurors, and tell them what they need to know in order to decide cases. Despite this, there are many things, true things, that lawyers are not allowed to tell jurors directly in statements to the jury or indirectly through testimony of their witnesses. Lawyers know these things, though, and I thought you might like to know some of things. #1. A lawyer can't tell the jurors anything that happened during settlement negotiations. He cannot let the jurors know, when asking them to make the defendant pay his client $100,000 that the defendant agreed to pay him $80,000 prior to the trial. The reason for this is that you want settlement negotiations to be very open. You don't want to damage a negotiation session because someone is afraid that what they say will get repeated to a jury if you don't strike a deal. #2 In Idaho, a lawyer can't tell the jurors that the defendant has insurance. In many other states, he can. Bec
Read more

Man Framed by Prosecutor Released After 29 Years in Prison Seeking Lawsuit

Image
19 year old, Charise Kamps, was found raped and strangled to death in her apartment in June 1980. Ralph Armstrong told the police that both of them were at the apartment alone doing cocaine before leaving to go see friends around 9:30 pm. Police said that they learned that Armstrong owed Kamp's boyfriend $400 and witnesses saw Armstrong handing Kamps money that night. However, the money was not found in the apartment, and Armstrong deposited $315 in his bank the next day.The defense argued that he got the money from his brother. One of the neighbors saw a lean, muscular man about 5 feet 5 inches tall with long, dark hair drive up to the apartment. Before the identification process, the police had the witness hypnotized. He was shown a photograph of Armstrong, and After being hypnotized, the witness changed the height of the man he saw. Later at a lineup to have the witness select the man he saw, he chose Armstrong. The other people in the lineup were police officers in wigs
Read more

Tuesday Tip: Reid Interrogation Technique

Image
Various methods have been used in police interrogations to elicit a confession. By far the most popular method used for over seventy years is the Reid Technique. This interrogation method assumes guilty suspects can be identified from certain behavioral cues. It is said to be proven as highly effective at getting confessions; however, there has been criticism about it for many years because it has been linked to many wrongful convictions.  Around 25 percent of post conviction DNA exonerations have been associated with a false confession from authorities using the Reid Technique. Even one of the first cases in which John Reid used this technique turned out to be a false confession. More and more scientists and scholars are saying this approach is based on outdated psychology. There are several components incorporated in this technique, including room design and how the investigator conducts the interview. There are three spatial zones the investigators use, which can be seen in
Read more