REMEMBER THE TITAN


     Now that the world knows the OceanGate Titan has imploded, killing everyone on board, the question arises whether there will be any lawsuits following this underwater disaster.

    The five who boarded the vessel on its ill-fated cruise to explore the wreck of the Titanic were all required to sign a waiver of liability, absolving the company of any liability for damages in the event of a disaster, and acknowledging the vessel was experimental, and going on this venture involved the risk of injury or death.

    There have been many articles written concerning mistakes that were made, and conscious choices by the company to engage in shortcuts and to disallow safety inspections before the voyage.

    There is no easy answer to this question.  

    Liability waivers are common on potentially hazardous ventures.  They are even common on trips that involve no apparent risk, just as a standard CYA practice by those owning the event.

    This will be a hard-fought battle in court.

    The validity of such a waiver is recognized by some states and not recognized by others; to this extent, the state in which the waiver was signed may affect the validity of the waiver.

    There are other avenues to get around these waivers which might or might not, in the end, be effective.  Was there full disclosure of the risks involved before the passengers signed the waiver?  Were the passengers given misleading information as to the construction or safety of the Titan before signing?  Did the passengers know about the shortcuts the company took in constructing the Titan?  Did the company avoid safety inspections as some have alleged, and if so, was this explained to the passengers?  Was there gross negligence on behalf of the company?  Since the wreck happened in international waters, and not within the territorial waters of the United States, how will this affect the jurisdiction in which the lawsuits can be brought?  

    Other issues concern who screwed up, OceanGate Expeditions, Ltd, or the actual manufacturer of the Titan?  How will the fact that OceanGate is registered in the Bahamas affect which laws apply?

    Another problem is that the man at the helm of OceanGate, Stockton Rush, died in the implosion.

    Another problem is that damages in the case of the wrongful death of these persons would certainly be many tens of millions of dollars, probably far in excess of the value of the company.  Certainly, a company of that size has insurance, but how much?  And would it cover this event?  

    I would hope so.

    Another problem is the gathering of evidence.  Currently, it is estimated that it costs about $250,000 per day to work on retrieving evidence from the scene.  Do any of the interested parties have the financial resources to retrieve the evidence necessary to definitively establish what happened and whose fault it was?  Who knows.

    I expect lawsuits to arise out of this disaster.  However, I am not confident these lawsuits would withstand the defense challenges I would expect to see.  I do, however, believe there will be some attempts to settle these lawsuits before trial for substantial sums of money.  The publicity is just too bad for OceanGate, and there are too many unknowns.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

7 Things Lawyers Can't Tell Jurors

Image
 It is a trial lawyer's job to educate jurors, and tell them what they need to know in order to decide cases. Despite this, there are many things, true things, that lawyers are not allowed to tell jurors directly in statements to the jury or indirectly through testimony of their witnesses. Lawyers know these things, though, and I thought you might like to know some of things. #1. A lawyer can't tell the jurors anything that happened during settlement negotiations. He cannot let the jurors know, when asking them to make the defendant pay his client $100,000 that the defendant agreed to pay him $80,000 prior to the trial. The reason for this is that you want settlement negotiations to be very open. You don't want to damage a negotiation session because someone is afraid that what they say will get repeated to a jury if you don't strike a deal. #2 In Idaho, a lawyer can't tell the jurors that the defendant has insurance. In many other states, he can. Bec...
Read more

OBAMA APPOINTEE DENIES GIULIANI ABILITY TO DEFEND HIMSELF, RESULTS IN $148 MILLION JUDGMENT

Image
In the aftermath of the January 6, 2021 protests, Rudy Giuliani has been ordered to pay over $148 million in damages to two Georgia election workers named by the former New York mayor.  What has not been explained to the general public is that there was never any trial concerning whether Mr. Giuliani had actually slandered or libeled these two persons.   In the case of Giuliani, the two Georgia election workers listed as plaintiffs in the suit against Giuliani sued him for saying they engaged in what amounted to election fraud.  They are allowed to ask the defendant ex-mayor for documents relevant to their suit and to his defense. These women brought their case against Giuliani in a jurisdiction that is heavily populated with Democrats.  They could have sued in their home state, Georgia, but did not. They wanted a jury pool of anti-Trump democrats, so they sued in Washington, D.C. They managed to get an incredibly biased Barack Obama-appointed, anti-Trump judge....
Read more

Man Framed by Prosecutor Released After 29 Years in Prison Seeking Lawsuit

Image
19 year old, Charise Kamps, was found raped and strangled to death in her apartment in June 1980. Ralph Armstrong told the police that both of them were at the apartment alone doing cocaine before leaving to go see friends around 9:30 pm. Police said that they learned that Armstrong owed Kamp's boyfriend $400 and witnesses saw Armstrong handing Kamps money that night. However, the money was not found in the apartment, and Armstrong deposited $315 in his bank the next day.The defense argued that he got the money from his brother. One of the neighbors saw a lean, muscular man about 5 feet 5 inches tall with long, dark hair drive up to the apartment. Before the identification process, the police had the witness hypnotized. He was shown a photograph of Armstrong, and After being hypnotized, the witness changed the height of the man he saw. Later at a lineup to have the witness select the man he saw, he chose Armstrong. The other people in the lineup were police officers in wigs...
Read more