Beyond Gerrymandering: Black Numbers Matter in Redistricting




For ages in this country's two-party electoral system, states have fought to give control of Congress to one party or the other.  There are voting districts in which votes are cast to determine which party will control each district's vote in the House of Representatives.  One of the ways a party might seek to gain control is by how the district boundaries are drawn.  Historically, the majority party within a state, in some cases, has gone to great lengths to weave district boundaries to include certain areas and exclude certain areas to ensure the minority party will have its ballot-box power diluted by including only a small fraction of the total vote in each district. The word "Gerrymandering" was named after Massachusetts Governor Elbridge Gerry, who signed a bill in 1812 that created a partisan district in Boston that was roughly shaped like a salamander.

When states' census numbers are tallied every 10 years, the states usually have to re-draw district lines to match changes in populations.

On June 8, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that the Republican-controlled state of Alabama had engaged in improper conduct when drawing its electoral map in 2021.  Democrats had challenged that map, arguing that their black voters were under-represented in districts.  Their argument was that the map drawn resulted in six majority-white districts and only one majority-black district. The majority opinion stated that the result of the 2021 map ran afoul of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, disallowed the redistricting, and ordered Alabama to create a second majority-black district because black people comprised 27% of Alabama's population.

Clarence Thomas, voting with the minority, opined that the 1965 Voting Rights Act did not require Alabama to "intentionally redraw its longstanding congressional districts so that black voters can control a number of seats roughly proportional to the black share of the state's population."  In fact, he said, the Constitution would not permit such legislation. 

Indeed, it appears that our U.S. Supreme Court has engaged in that conduct. At least in the context of numbers of one race v. another race in a district, regardless of the shape of the district, states may have to take into account the total percentage of a minority and make sure their redistricting does not dilute that race's voting power.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

7 Things Lawyers Can't Tell Jurors

Image
 It is a trial lawyer's job to educate jurors, and tell them what they need to know in order to decide cases. Despite this, there are many things, true things, that lawyers are not allowed to tell jurors directly in statements to the jury or indirectly through testimony of their witnesses. Lawyers know these things, though, and I thought you might like to know some of things. #1. A lawyer can't tell the jurors anything that happened during settlement negotiations. He cannot let the jurors know, when asking them to make the defendant pay his client $100,000 that the defendant agreed to pay him $80,000 prior to the trial. The reason for this is that you want settlement negotiations to be very open. You don't want to damage a negotiation session because someone is afraid that what they say will get repeated to a jury if you don't strike a deal. #2 In Idaho, a lawyer can't tell the jurors that the defendant has insurance. In many other states, he can. Bec...
Read more

OBAMA APPOINTEE DENIES GIULIANI ABILITY TO DEFEND HIMSELF, RESULTS IN $148 MILLION JUDGMENT

Image
In the aftermath of the January 6, 2021 protests, Rudy Giuliani has been ordered to pay over $148 million in damages to two Georgia election workers named by the former New York mayor.  What has not been explained to the general public is that there was never any trial concerning whether Mr. Giuliani had actually slandered or libeled these two persons.   In the case of Giuliani, the two Georgia election workers listed as plaintiffs in the suit against Giuliani sued him for saying they engaged in what amounted to election fraud.  They are allowed to ask the defendant ex-mayor for documents relevant to their suit and to his defense. These women brought their case against Giuliani in a jurisdiction that is heavily populated with Democrats.  They could have sued in their home state, Georgia, but did not. They wanted a jury pool of anti-Trump democrats, so they sued in Washington, D.C. They managed to get an incredibly biased Barack Obama-appointed, anti-Trump judge....
Read more

Man Framed by Prosecutor Released After 29 Years in Prison Seeking Lawsuit

Image
19 year old, Charise Kamps, was found raped and strangled to death in her apartment in June 1980. Ralph Armstrong told the police that both of them were at the apartment alone doing cocaine before leaving to go see friends around 9:30 pm. Police said that they learned that Armstrong owed Kamp's boyfriend $400 and witnesses saw Armstrong handing Kamps money that night. However, the money was not found in the apartment, and Armstrong deposited $315 in his bank the next day.The defense argued that he got the money from his brother. One of the neighbors saw a lean, muscular man about 5 feet 5 inches tall with long, dark hair drive up to the apartment. Before the identification process, the police had the witness hypnotized. He was shown a photograph of Armstrong, and After being hypnotized, the witness changed the height of the man he saw. Later at a lineup to have the witness select the man he saw, he chose Armstrong. The other people in the lineup were police officers in wigs...
Read more