Using Drug Dogs at a Traffic Stop Illegal?

North Idaho attorney Joanna McFarland argued that using a drug dog at a traffic stop is overreaching and illegal, and that her client should have been released after police officers cleared him of driving under the influence. Lewiston police detained Michael Parkins while waiting for a drug dog to pursue another investigation even though they had no reasonable suspicion that Parkins had any controlled substances on him. When the drug dog arrived to the scene, he alerted police of possible drugs in the car. They found two ounces of methamphetamine in a nylon bag in Parkins' pants.
Comments from Allen:  In jurisdictions all over the country, patrol officers are stopping drivers for one crime as a pretext for searching for drugs.  I see this almost every week in my practice in Idaho.  Why Idaho in particular?  Idaho has not legalized the use of marijuana, while that drug has been decriminalized to one degree or another in nearby Montana, California, Oregon and Washington.  Patrol officers look for cars traversing the highways with out-of-state plates, and then look for some excuse to stop the vehicle to search for drugs.  Various reasons commonly given for the stops:  illegal windshield tint, speeding, and even "following too closely."

 Once the reason for the stop has concluded, the driver is supposed to be released to resume his trip.  What happens frequently, though, is that the driver of an out-of-state vehicle is asked a series of questions regarding whether they have drugs in their cars.  They are told that if they are honest with the officer about drugs in the car, they will get a ticket and he will let them go.  Sometimes, as in this case involving Ms. McFarland, they are told if they don't admit to what drugs they are carrying, the officer will make them wait until he can have a drug-detecting dog come over for a sniff search.  

 If the officer does not have reasonable suspicion to believe the motorist was involved in other criminal activity after concluding the stop, he must let the motorist go. In this instance, it is absolutely appropriate to challenge the reason for detaining the motorist.

 If you believe the police should be allowed to keep motorists stopped at the side of the road after they have been issued their speeding tickets or after they passed their field sobriety tests during a DUI stop, consider this:  making every out-of-state motorist wait at the side of the road until a drug dog is available is incredibly burdensome on the average traveler.  You would be causing a lot of innocent travelers to miss appointments and sit at the side of a hot road for an hour for no reason.  I had one client have to sit and watch police officers unwrap all of the gifts he had in his car after returning from a shopping trip.  

 Making motorists wait for drug dogs, and allowing searches without probable cause, are impositions we don't need in a free society.

***********************************************************************************************************************

Allen Browning is an attorney in Idaho Falls, Idaho who handles personal injury and criminal defense. He has over 30 years of experience and handled thousands of cases. Allen handles cases from all over Idaho. Call (208) 542-2700 to set up a free consultation if you are facing legal trouble or you have been involved in an accident.

Also, check out browninglaw.net for more information about Allen and Browning Law.

Allen Browning can help with all personal injury claims including motor vehicle accidents,truck accidents, auto accidents, serious and disabling accidents, and wrongful death claims.

Allen Browning is an Idaho Falls attorney who can also help with drunk driving (DUI), traffic violations, Felony, Misdemeanor, Domestic Violence, Drug Crimes, Theft, Juvenile Crimes, battery and assault charges, Violent Crimes, and Probation/Parole Violations. He is one of the most experienced and successful criminal defense attorneys in Idaho.


Allen is able to provide his services if the incident occurs in the following Idaho Areas: American Falls, Arco, Blackfoot, Boise, Burley, Driggs, Idaho Falls, Malad City, Pocatello, Rexburg, Rigby, Salmon, St. Anthony, Twin Falls, Bannock County, Bingham County, Bonneville County, Butte County, Cassia County, Clark County, Fremont County, Jefferson County, Lemhi County, Madison County, Oneida County, Power County, Teton County, and Twin Falls County.  
Sources for more information:
http://www.localnews8.com/news/n-idaho-attorney-challenging-use-of-drug-dog-in-arrest/40243378

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

7 Things Lawyers Can't Tell Jurors

Image
 It is a trial lawyer's job to educate jurors, and tell them what they need to know in order to decide cases. Despite this, there are many things, true things, that lawyers are not allowed to tell jurors directly in statements to the jury or indirectly through testimony of their witnesses. Lawyers know these things, though, and I thought you might like to know some of things. #1. A lawyer can't tell the jurors anything that happened during settlement negotiations. He cannot let the jurors know, when asking them to make the defendant pay his client $100,000 that the defendant agreed to pay him $80,000 prior to the trial. The reason for this is that you want settlement negotiations to be very open. You don't want to damage a negotiation session because someone is afraid that what they say will get repeated to a jury if you don't strike a deal. #2 In Idaho, a lawyer can't tell the jurors that the defendant has insurance. In many other states, he can. Bec...
Read more

OBAMA APPOINTEE DENIES GIULIANI ABILITY TO DEFEND HIMSELF, RESULTS IN $148 MILLION JUDGMENT

Image
In the aftermath of the January 6, 2021 protests, Rudy Giuliani has been ordered to pay over $148 million in damages to two Georgia election workers named by the former New York mayor.  What has not been explained to the general public is that there was never any trial concerning whether Mr. Giuliani had actually slandered or libeled these two persons.   In the case of Giuliani, the two Georgia election workers listed as plaintiffs in the suit against Giuliani sued him for saying they engaged in what amounted to election fraud.  They are allowed to ask the defendant ex-mayor for documents relevant to their suit and to his defense. These women brought their case against Giuliani in a jurisdiction that is heavily populated with Democrats.  They could have sued in their home state, Georgia, but did not. They wanted a jury pool of anti-Trump democrats, so they sued in Washington, D.C. They managed to get an incredibly biased Barack Obama-appointed, anti-Trump judge....
Read more

Man Framed by Prosecutor Released After 29 Years in Prison Seeking Lawsuit

Image
19 year old, Charise Kamps, was found raped and strangled to death in her apartment in June 1980. Ralph Armstrong told the police that both of them were at the apartment alone doing cocaine before leaving to go see friends around 9:30 pm. Police said that they learned that Armstrong owed Kamp's boyfriend $400 and witnesses saw Armstrong handing Kamps money that night. However, the money was not found in the apartment, and Armstrong deposited $315 in his bank the next day.The defense argued that he got the money from his brother. One of the neighbors saw a lean, muscular man about 5 feet 5 inches tall with long, dark hair drive up to the apartment. Before the identification process, the police had the witness hypnotized. He was shown a photograph of Armstrong, and After being hypnotized, the witness changed the height of the man he saw. Later at a lineup to have the witness select the man he saw, he chose Armstrong. The other people in the lineup were police officers in wigs...
Read more