Four Police Officers Arrested For Child Cruelty at Boot Camp


Parents in California sent their children to a week-long  police lead boot camp called Leadership Empowerment and Discipline(LEAD), intending it would help with their children's behavioral problems. However, their children came home bloody and bruised. One child even came back with a fractured hand and broken fingers. Four police officers were arrested for abusing 15 children ranging from 12 to 17 years old at a boot camp for troubled kids. The officers were arrested for willful cruelty to children and other crimes under color of authority.

Previously, the LEAD camp had been operating for 17 years without any reports of abuse. The FBI Computer Analysis Response Team aided in a two month investigation. Lawyers representing the children said that the children were slammed against walls, had their fingers stepped on while doing push-ups, and were beaten in a dark room.

Each of the four officers posted a $20,000 bail bond. This case has been submitted to the San Luis Obispo County district attorney's office for prosecution.  The officers involved have been placed on administrative leave.


Comments from Allen:
The LEAD program refers to this experience as a "boot camp."  Times have changed.  U.S. Marine drill sergeants are not allowed to engage in beating soldiers in their care.  Further, these kids were not undergoing this experience as part of a court-ordered punishment.  This was not, under any definition, a boot camp experience.

In this case, the criminal justice system and the civil system meet. The parents of the children are going to sue the officers for the wrongs done to their children.  However, the conduct in these cases is criminal.  By allowing the prosecutor to convict the officers of crimes before filing the civil suits, the attorneys for the families are letting the state establish the conduct which will serve as the basis for civil liability.  Once the officers are convicted, the only question remaining will be the amount of damages in each case.  Further, on a case-by-case basis, the court might allow punitive damages.

The parents will have the option of suing under state or federal civil rights law.  The federal civil rights law, 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 allows such suits when a person's rights are violated "under color of law."  This can probably be established.  

Normally, such federal suits are brought only against the individual officers, and not against the county which sponsors the program and pays the officers while they are conducting the camp, because a local government may not be sued under section 1983 for an injury inflicted solely by its employees or agents; it can only be sued when someone is injured by the execution of a government policy or custom. With so many kids being subjected to brutality at this county-run program, the plaintiffs may be able to establish that their kids were injured by the execution of official San Luis Obispo County policy.  That would make the county itself liable for damages under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983.

Owen v. Independence (U.S. 1980)

***********************************************************************************************************************

Allen Browning is an attorney in Idaho Falls, Idaho who handles personal injury and criminal defense. He has over 30 years of experience and handled thousands of cases. Allen handles cases from all over Idaho. Call (208) 542-2700 to set up a free consultation if you are facing legal trouble or you have been involved in an accident.

Also, check out browninglaw.net for more information about Allen and Browning Law.

Allen Browning can help with all personal injury claims including motor vehicle accidents,truck accidents, auto accidents, serious and disabling accidents, and wrongful death claims.

Allen Browning is an Idaho Falls attorney who can also help with drunk driving (DUI) , Felony, Misdemeanor, Domestic Violence, Drug Crimes, Theft, Juvenile Crimes, battery and assault charges, Violent Crimes, and Probation/Parole Violations. He is one of the most experienced and successful criminal defense attorneys in Idaho.


Allen is able to provide his services if the incident occurs in the following Idaho Areas: American Falls, Arco, Blackfoot, Boise, Burley, Driggs, Idaho Falls, Malad City, Pocatello, Rexburg, Rigby, Salmon, St. Anthony, Twin Falls, Bannock County, Bingham County, Bonneville County, Butte County, Cassia County, Clark County, Fremont County, Jefferson County, Lemhi County, Madison County, Oneida County, Power County, Teton County, and Twin Falls County.

 Sources for more information:
http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/california-police-officers-arrested-boot-camp-abuse-32910948

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/four-california-police-officers-arrested-on-child-cruelty-charges-at-boot-camp/

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_BOOT_CAMP_ABUSE?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/08/06/4-california-police-officers-arrested-on-suspicion-boot-camp-abuse/

 http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2015/08/05/california-officers-abuse-kids-boot-camp/31193455/

 http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/4-southern-calif-cops-arrested-child-abuse-charges-article-1.2317220

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

7 Things Lawyers Can't Tell Jurors

Image
 It is a trial lawyer's job to educate jurors, and tell them what they need to know in order to decide cases. Despite this, there are many things, true things, that lawyers are not allowed to tell jurors directly in statements to the jury or indirectly through testimony of their witnesses. Lawyers know these things, though, and I thought you might like to know some of things. #1. A lawyer can't tell the jurors anything that happened during settlement negotiations. He cannot let the jurors know, when asking them to make the defendant pay his client $100,000 that the defendant agreed to pay him $80,000 prior to the trial. The reason for this is that you want settlement negotiations to be very open. You don't want to damage a negotiation session because someone is afraid that what they say will get repeated to a jury if you don't strike a deal. #2 In Idaho, a lawyer can't tell the jurors that the defendant has insurance. In many other states, he can. Bec...
Read more

OBAMA APPOINTEE DENIES GIULIANI ABILITY TO DEFEND HIMSELF, RESULTS IN $148 MILLION JUDGMENT

Image
In the aftermath of the January 6, 2021 protests, Rudy Giuliani has been ordered to pay over $148 million in damages to two Georgia election workers named by the former New York mayor.  What has not been explained to the general public is that there was never any trial concerning whether Mr. Giuliani had actually slandered or libeled these two persons.   In the case of Giuliani, the two Georgia election workers listed as plaintiffs in the suit against Giuliani sued him for saying they engaged in what amounted to election fraud.  They are allowed to ask the defendant ex-mayor for documents relevant to their suit and to his defense. These women brought their case against Giuliani in a jurisdiction that is heavily populated with Democrats.  They could have sued in their home state, Georgia, but did not. They wanted a jury pool of anti-Trump democrats, so they sued in Washington, D.C. They managed to get an incredibly biased Barack Obama-appointed, anti-Trump judge....
Read more

Man Framed by Prosecutor Released After 29 Years in Prison Seeking Lawsuit

Image
19 year old, Charise Kamps, was found raped and strangled to death in her apartment in June 1980. Ralph Armstrong told the police that both of them were at the apartment alone doing cocaine before leaving to go see friends around 9:30 pm. Police said that they learned that Armstrong owed Kamp's boyfriend $400 and witnesses saw Armstrong handing Kamps money that night. However, the money was not found in the apartment, and Armstrong deposited $315 in his bank the next day.The defense argued that he got the money from his brother. One of the neighbors saw a lean, muscular man about 5 feet 5 inches tall with long, dark hair drive up to the apartment. Before the identification process, the police had the witness hypnotized. He was shown a photograph of Armstrong, and After being hypnotized, the witness changed the height of the man he saw. Later at a lineup to have the witness select the man he saw, he chose Armstrong. The other people in the lineup were police officers in wigs...
Read more